IQGA – International Qi Gong Association

bio-plasmic life, chakras, aura, nadis, human energetic fields, Kirlian Photography, beings of light, energetic channels, auric bleeding, human genetics, quantum biology, human bio-computer, crystalline consciousness, crystalline-electric cosmos, quantum entanglement, non-locality, brain and heart, autonomic nervous system, intuitive intelligence,

image_pdfimage_print

Institute of Spiritual Science Inc. Publishing 2016.

All Rights Reserved.

No part of this article may be fragmented or copied without a written approval by the author.

This article may be shared or posted on websites, Facebook pages or any public forum only in its entirety, and only if it is offered free of charge to the public without any page charges, download fees, or membership charges.

References

  1. Eisberg, R., and Resnick, R., “Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles” (2nd Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, p. 59–60, 1985, ISBN 047187373X.
  2. Kumar, M., “Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality” W. W. Norton & Company, p. 375–376, 2011, ISBN 978-0393339888.
  3. Selleri, Franco, “Wave-Particle Duality,” Springer, p. 55, 2012, ISBN 978-1461364689.
  4. Walker, Evan Harris, “The Physics of Consciousness,” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus, p. 271, 2000, ISBN 0-7382-0436-6.
  5. Bischof, M., “Biophotons – The Light in Our Cells,” (in German), Zweitausendeins, Frankfurt, 9th Ed., 522 pages, May 1998, ISBN 3-86150-095-7.
  6. Chang, J.J., Fisch, J., Popp, F.A., “Biophotons,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998·
  7. David Hodgson “Chapter 7: Science and Determinism, Rationality + Consciousness = Free Will,” Oxford University Press, 2012, ISBN 9780199845309.
  8. Chishima, K., “Revolution of Biology and Medicine,” Neo-Haematological Society Press, 1972·
  9. Frank-Kamenetskii, M.D., “Unraveling DNA,” Perseus Books, 1997.
  10. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N., “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, Vol. 47, No. 10, p. 777-780, 1935.
  11. Stapp, H.P., “Theory of Reality,” Foundations of Physics, Vol. 7, Nos. 5/6, p. 313-323, 1977.
  12. Bohm, D., and Aharonov, Y., “Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky.” Physical Review Vol. 108, No. 4, p.1070-1076, 1957.
  13. Bell, John S., “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox.” Physics Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 195-200, 1964.
  14. Aspect, Alain, Dalibard, Jean and Roger, Gerard, “Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers,” Physical Review Letters Vol. 49, No. 25, p. 1804-1807, 1982.
  15. Clauser, John F., and Shimony, Abner, “Bell’s Theorem: Experimental Tests and Implications,” Reports on Progress in Physics Vol. 41, No. 4, p. 1881-1927, 1978.
  16. Frescura, F.A.M., and Hiley, B.J., “The Implicate Order, Algebras, and the Spinor.” Foundations of Physics Vol. 10, Nos. ½, p.7-31, 1980.
  17. Helliwell, T.M., and Konkowski, D.A., “Causality Paradoxes and Nonparadoxes: Classical Superluminal Signals and Quantum Measurements,” American Journal of Physics Vol. 51, No. 11, p. 996-1003, 1983.
  18. Gribbin, John, “In Search of Schrodinger’s Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality,” New York, Bantam Books, 1984.
  19. Hiley, B.J., “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.” Review of d’Espagnat 1976. Contemporary Physics Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 411-414, 1977.
  20. Zukav, G., “The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics,” New York: William Morrow & Co, p. 310-314, 1979.
  21. Papaliolios, Costas. “Experimental Test of a Hidden-Variable Quantum Theory,” Physical Review Letters Vol. 18, No. 15, p. 622-625, 1967.
  22. Bell, John “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox,” Physics Vol. 1 No. 3, p. 195–200, 1964.
  23. Bell, John, “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics,” Cambridge University Press, p. 65, 1987.
  24. Parker, C.B., McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Physics (2nd Ed.). McGraw-Hill. p. 542, 1994, ISBN 0-07-051400-3.
  25. Freedman, Stuart J., Clauser, John F., “Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 28, No. 14, p. 938–941, 1972.
  26. Aspect, A.; et al.,”Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell’s Theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 47, p. 460–463, 1981.
  27. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., and Roger, G., “Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 49, No. 2, p. 91–94, 1982.
  28. Aspect, A., et al., “Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 49, p. 1804–1807, 1982.
  29. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. “About Resonant Scattering and other Hypothetical Effects in the Orsay Atomic-Cascade Experiment Tests of Bell Inequalities: a Discussion and Some New Experimental Data,” Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, Vol. 43: p. 345–348, 1985.
  30. Bell, J. S., “On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. Vol. 38, p. 447–452, 1966.
  31. Stapp, Henry P., “Bell’s Theorem and World Process,” Nuovo Cimento, Vol. 29B, No. 2, p. 270–276 (quote on page 271), 1975.
  32. Davies, Paul C. W., and Brown, Julian R., “The Ghost in the Atom: A Discussion of the Mysteries of Quantum Physics,” Cambridge University Press, p. 45-46, 1993.
  33. Bohm, David, “Wholeness and the Implicate Order,” (Online-Ausg. Ed.), Hoboken: Routledge, 2002, ISBN 0203995155.
  34. Gröblacher, Simon, Paterek, Tomasz, Kaltenbaek, Rainer, Brukner, Časlav, Żukowski, Marek, Aspelmeyer, Markus, Zeilinger, Anton “An Experimental Test of Non-Local Realism,” Nature, Vol. 446, No. 7138, p. 871–875, 2007.
  35. Bohm, David, “The Implicate or Enfolded Order: A New Order for Physics,” In Mind in Nature: Essays on the Interface of Science and Philosophy, Ed. John B. Cobb, Jr, and David Ray Griffin, p. 37-42, Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1978.
  36. Bohm, David, “The Implicate Order: A New Order for Physics.” Process Studies Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 73-102, 1978.
  37. Bohm, David, “Wholeness and the Implicate Order,” London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
  38. Bohm David J., “Fragmentation in Science and Society,” Impact of Science on Society Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 159-69, 1970.
  39. Bohm David J., and Hiley, Basil J., “Some Remarks on Sarfatti’s Proposed Connection between Quantum Phenomena and the Volitional Activity of the Observer-Participator,” Psychoenergetic Systems Vol. 1, p. 173-179, 1976.
  40. Bohm David J., and Hiley, Basil J., “Einstein and Non-Locality in the Quantum Theory,” In Einstein: The First Hundred Years, ed. Maurice Goldsmith, Alan Mackay, and James Woudhugsen, p. 47-61, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1980.
  41. Bohm David J., and Hiley, Basil J., “On the Intuitive Understanding of Nonlocality as Implied by Quantum Theory,” Foundations of Physics Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 93-109, 1975.
  42. Bohm, David, “Quantum Theory as an Indication of a New Order in Physics. B. Implicate and Explicate Order in Physical Law,” Foundations of Physics Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 139-68, 1973.
  43. Bohm, David, “The Implicate or Enfolded Order: A New Order for Physics.” In Mind in Nature: Essays on the Interface of Science and Philosophy, ed. John B. Cobb, Jr, and David Ray Griffin, p. 37-42, Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1978.
  44. Bohm, David, “On the Creation of a Deeper Insight into What May Underlie Quantum Physical Law,” In Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality, and Particles: An International Collection of Contributions in Honor of Louis de Broglie on the Occasion of the Jubilee of His Celebrated Thesis, Ed., M. Flato, Z. Maric, A. Milojevic, D. Sternheimer, and J.P. Vigier, p. 1-10. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1976.
  45. Bohm David J., “Fragmentation in Science and Society.” Impact of Science on Society Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 159-69, 1970.
  46. Bohm, David, “On the Subjectivity and Objectivity of Knowledge,” In Beyond Chance and Necessity: A Critical Inquiry into Professor Jacques Monod’s Chance and Necessity, ed. John Lewis, Chap. 10, p. 121-30. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1974.
  47. Bohm, David, “Further Remarks on Order,” In Towards a Theoretical Biology. 2. Sketches, ed. C.H. Waddington, 41-60. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
  48. Feyerabend, P. K., “Professor Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature,” Review of David J. Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics” (New York: Van Nostrand, 1957), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 10, No. 40, p. 321-38, 1960.
  49. Bohm, David, and Rene Weber, “The Enfolding-Unfolding Universe: A Conversation with David Bohm.” Re-Vision Vol. 1, Nos. ¾, p. 24-51, 1978.
  50. Bohm David J., and Hiley, Basil J., “Measurement Understood Through the Quantum Potential Approach.” Foundations of Physics Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 255-274, 1984.
  51. Mattuck, Richard D., “Non-Locality in Bohm-Bub’s Hidden Variable Theory of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.” Physics Letters Vol. 81A, No. 6, p. 331-332, 1981.
  52. Bohm, David J., “Quantum Theory” New York, Prentice-Hall, 1951.
  53. Bohm David J., and Hiley, Basil J., “Some Remarks on Sarfatti’s Proposed Connection between Quantum Phenomena and the Volitional Activity of the Observer-Participator,” Psychoenergetic Systems Vol. 1, p. 173-179, 1976.

This content was originally published here.